↑ 14 References
I don’t think I actually hold moral conceptions to a binary duality like this. Under the hood, moral considerations hold a value (and I consider that value to be determined by something like Friendly Utilitarianism).
“The moral value of quantification is that it treats all lives as equally valuable, so actions that bring down the highest numbers of homicides prevent the greatest amount of human tragedy.” (Steven Pinker, Enlightenment Now)
Friendly Utilitarianism, but maybe without the friendly when Pinker discusses it.
Growing Thoughts
These are still very raw and undeveloped, but have a lot of content connected to them. Currently, both these growing thoughts seem to fall under the umbrella of Think more scientifically, and more morally.
Friendly Utilitarianism
Probabilistic Thinking
In some ways, this is the central thesis that leads to both Friendly Utilitarianism and A Clarity of Thought.
Take into account my Lifeview and Workview. Some consideration should be made to recommendations of Friendly Utilitarianism.
If Free Will doesn’t exist, then what about Friendly Utilitarianism which relies on choice and opportunity cost?