Other notes:

I don’t think I actually hold moral conceptions to a binary duality like this. Under the hood, moral considerations hold a value (and I consider that value to be determined by something like Friendly Utilitarianism).

Hard to categorize

This distinction does not try to draw a clear line, rather it serves to remind us that not all moral considerations are the same. Negative and positive morality are not isolated from each other. It’s possible that improving a positive moral consideration is worth the downside of making a negative moral consideration worse, as is aligned from standard utilitiarian thinking.

Widen scope

This duality also serves to widen the scope of what we consider morally relevant. We can add more to our consideration of what falls under morality when we don’t require all types of moral considerations to fight with each other on an equal playing field.