Tana

↑ 1 References

Using Tana to model the core relationships…

→

Main relationships from Tana

→

is part of

→

this is equivalent to is a, but I think the part of framing should be the default

→

thinking about locations here

→

so I’m going to change the is a to part of above (except locations where I already used part of)

→

is connected to

→

instead of using this, I’m just free-handing all the relationships as I like, I guess

→

If part of is the core semantic relationship, then I can worry about extracting that in the script first. This part of semantic relationship can be surfaced in more places (maybe in the header), and the other relationship types would remain different sections of backlinks (for now).

→

This is my initial thought. More to flesh out here.

→

Search Results

Tana

↑ 1 References