Should you do something that nobody else but you could do? 2 →

The criteria for individuals

 →
#
>

Neglectedness

→
#
>

Neglectedness: All else equal, we prefer causes that receive less attention from other actors, particularly other major philanthropists.

→
#
>

This is where the translation to an individual’s perspective gets more interesting. There are two ways of looking at neglectedness with regards to individuals:

→
#
>

Attention neglect

→
#
>

Attention neglect is the simplest form of neglect, and the one that I believe Open Philanthropy focuses on the most as well.

→
#
>

If nobody is giving certain work or a certain job that is both important and tractable, then that qualifies as attention neglect. Working on such a problem would rank high on an optimization scale.

→
#
>

Work that fits this description would be in supply to some degree, and yet be in low demand. So sometimes markets are able to correct for this attention neglect, but not all work of this kind has a good market environment.

→
#
>

Niche neglect

→
#
>

Examples:

→
#
>

Nobody is focusing on the relationship between these two problems and how they are similar or different

→
#
>

Nobody is focusing on this part of the pipeline of the problem ( Solve Problems Upstream, where in the stream are people focused?)

→
#
>

What about quality neglect?

→
#
>

Maybe you think you can do something better than most other people. That’s fair, but the more demand there is for certain work (e.g. competing with many other for a job) the less confident you must be with that belief.

→