Joel Chan has thought about this too

→

for example, a general ontology may be like Joel Chan’s Discourse Graph (types: question, claim, evidence, etc.. relationships: supports, opposes, informs, etc)

→

#

if a user can translate their knowledge graph into this “discourse graph ontology”, then other users can see how to utilize that user’s knowledge graph in the context of a discourse graph ontology

→

#

a user could create this translation / functor by describing how that user’s knowledge graph types and relationships map to the general ontology’s types and relationships

→

#

Joel Chan

→

#

References

Joel Chan Discourse Graph

→

#

References

Joel Chan Discourse Graph

parent of 7513873 (notes)

→

#

I have a rough proposal for how to do this in a way that is similar to Joel Chan’s Discourse Graph here: Building a knowledge graph in Logseq

→

Search Results

Joel Chan

↑ 8 References

References

[[Logseq]] has a stated goal to build a [[World Knowledge Graph]]. Here’s what I think they…

Create a general knowledge ontology that users can create translations into

References

Joel Chan Discourse Graph

References