How the government should get involved

One way this could happen is that the government could fund operations for GiveWell.

→

This avoids the issue of government giving money to these charities directly for now, as this only creates a lean service for government to enable extra-governmental giving.

→

#

This would unlock more of GiveWell’s revenue from individual donors and from other institutions to be sent directly to charities. GiveWell does not hold on to its excess assets.

→

#

Alternatively, the government could begin a program to take on the most cost-effective global interventions.

→

#

To begin, it might be similar to GiveWell, comparing different existing charities and causes.

→

#

But eventually, this would be an opportunity for the US government to create a dynamic institution that can shift it’s priorities and funding as it cost-effectiveness changes or as our understanding of what matters evolves.

→

#

Earmarking government funds for an institution like this makes much more sense to me than earmarking for one specific cause or issue (like Malaria, for example).

→

#

This institution would be able to easily adjust it’s focus to the most tractable and important concern without the need to assume that one specific issue will be

→

#

Maybe most importantly for our society, this would be a concrete step in having our government’s efforts to improve the world acknowledge the importance of focusing on outcomes and attempt to maximize the good we do with our resources.

→

Search Results